This article is a sad, but interesting commentary on a tricky legal and artistic issue. What creative thoughts and ideas can be "owned"? And what exactly is required to call something "original"? ) It's very difficult to come with something so unusual as to be completely unique or original, but that doesn't mean we can't add something different and worthwhile. Art, by its very nature, takes us from the familiar or shared experience into the realm of new thoughts, ideas and emotions. But, in both music and visual art, where do we draw the line between referencing or playing with another's familiar idea and piracy or copyright violation?
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110624/01393814836/kind-blue-using-copyright-to-make-hobby-artist-pay-up.shtml
Thoughts on music and what's going on in the music industry, and ideas for musicians trying to get their music out.
Friday, June 24, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(27)
-
▼
June
(7)
- What are you waiting for? - MTT - Music Think Tank
- Is Facebook Tumbling? - hypebot
- What is truly original in music or art?
- Comparing Google’s and Apple’s Cloud Approach | Se...
- Do Social Networks Really Help Musicians? - MTT - ...
- The Musician's Arsenal: Killer Apps, Tools and Sit...
- Google Offers A Playable Homepage. Let's Hear Your...
-
▼
June
(7)
No comments:
Post a Comment